Carbon in Sump

Discussion in 'Filters, Pumps, etc..' started by GatorDrew, Apr 29, 2007.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. inwall75

    inwall75 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    7,172
    Location:
    America
  2. Click Here!

  3. GatorDrew

    GatorDrew Astrea Snail

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    65
    I think I'm switching to SeaChem Matrix. Seems like good stuff.

    That chart doesn't rate Chemi-Pure, but I it sounds like SEACHEM may be the best for the dollar.
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2007
  4. inwall75

    inwall75 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    7,172
    Location:
    America
    Let me explain why the Black Diamond is used so commonly. It is made of sub-bituminous coal which is much harder than the Lignite carbons. That means it can be used in higher flow or even in a canister filter without breaking apart (called friability in the carbon industry). So while the Lignites are more effective, they are much less user-friendly.

    The Matrix is a better carbon but it is also more expensive.
     
  5. GatorDrew

    GatorDrew Astrea Snail

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    65
    So... If I got a phosban reactor.

    Half with rowaphos/phosban or whatever good phosphate remove.

    The other half... Matrix or Black Diamond?
     
  6. inwall75

    inwall75 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    7,172
    Location:
    America
    They are both excellent. The matrix will have better flow characteristics though.
     
  7. Black_Raven

    Black_Raven Scooter Blennie

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,220
    Location:
    Woodbury, MN,Minnesota
    The problem with Sea chem's carbon is that it is made up of very small beads and you need a fine mesh bag otherwise its a mess to use.
     
  8. Click Here!

  9. GatorDrew

    GatorDrew Astrea Snail

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    65
    can you have a fine mesh bag in a phosban reactor? Or should the media really be exposed?

    I may just stick to Marineland if that's the better one to use providing I use it in a phosban reactor.
     
  10. inwall75

    inwall75 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    7,172
    Location:
    America
    If it's in a phosban reactor, you don't need a media bag.
     
  11. Tangster

    Tangster 3reef Sponsor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,644
    Location:
    Va/Ct
    If you use a ferric Oxide in that PO4 reactor better not mix the bed with Carbon.. one will brake the other up and you will have a mess then. I have seen that tried . Also the ferric oxide will clot in the reactor if its not allowed to float properly hence the term/name fluidized bed reactor.
     
  12. GatorDrew

    GatorDrew Astrea Snail

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    65
    Whoa... thanks Tangster.

    So, one phosban reactor with just rowaphos or phosban.

    The carbon.

    Should I get an "in-tank filter (20i or 40i)" or another phosban reactor?

    My return pump should be able to adequately power two phosbans and one refugium. However, it's more ball valves, etc. Appx cost ~$50.

    If I got one of those in-tank ones and took out all the filters, etc and just put a nice fine media bag with Seachem I should be good to go. Appx cost ~20.

    Thanks again for the heads up!