Best lighting for 220g Sps Tank

Discussion in 'Reef Lighting' started by familiar1985, Nov 8, 2009.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. ZachB

    ZachB Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    3,111
    Location:
    Earth
    I really like Metal Halides. I would have a very hard time switching back to T5's. I would do 250's if I were you.
     
  2. Click Here!

  3. chuckdee

    chuckdee Peppermint Shrimp

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    423
    Location:
    Las Vegas
    250 watt at 24 inches will work fine for SPS.

    I would do a combo of 10000K-15000K SE MH lighing for maximum PAR and supplement using actinic T-5's or VHO's for color.

    Whoever thinks T-5's penetrate more PAR through the water column then MH's is crazy. Especially is you are comparing T-5's to 400w MH's..

    I have seen nice reefs using only T-5's, but they are usually shallow (less then 24").
     
  4. familiar1985

    familiar1985 Bristle Worm

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2008
    Messages:
    136
    Location:
    Beverly Hills
    Gotta jump on one bandwagon or another :)

    Im sure most reputable coral distributors and stores that have tons of money invested use halides (Ora, Tyree......), i dont see a reason to fight the trend.

    To me the biggest downside of halides are the ugly fixtures they come in. While the t5 fixtures look nice.
     
  5. GuitarMan89

    GuitarMan89 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2008
    Messages:
    5,736
    Location:
    Wilmington, DE
    I would go with MH, I have only used T5s so far and do like them. I have grown clams and sps with them with great coloration. However, I feel MHs are the closest thing we can get to the sun right now. I also want that shimmer effect. Now, with your tank, You will probably want more then 2 250w MH. I know a guy with a 5x3x2 tank and he used 3 400w mH with galaxy ballasts and 14K sps bulbs and his tank looked awesome. Your problem will be finding a fixture with either 400w MH or 3 bulbs that isn't 6 feet long. Your best bet may be to make a hood that fits your style and then make a retro kit.
     
  6. seabass1

    seabass1 Montipora Digitata

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,088
    Location:
    Home in San Diego, CA.
    Go with the Geissman fixture, 2 X 250 MH with whatever supplemental T5's......all the way!!!!! :smokin:
     
  7. Av8Bluewater

    Av8Bluewater Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,401
    Location:
    Dallas
  8. Click Here!

  9. GuitarMan89

    GuitarMan89 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2008
    Messages:
    5,736
    Location:
    Wilmington, DE
    For the depth, 250s will be fine, but at 5 feet long and 3 feet wide, you will need a third light IMO to cover the added area. What many people with tank dimensions like that is actually stagger them. So you can have one towards the front middle, one towards the back middle then another towards the front middle forming kind of like a triangle.
     
  10. bwalker9801

    bwalker9801 Zoanthid

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,118
    Location:
    Saint Augustine, Florida
    I would go t5 less heat and electricity more bulb combo options,more coverage to name a few reasons.
     
  11. seabass1

    seabass1 Montipora Digitata

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,088
    Location:
    Home in San Diego, CA.
    Agreed, for a 5ft + tank.
     
  12. 32Boom

    32Boom Coral Banded Shrimp

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    394
    Location:
    MI
    What are you basing this on?

    PM me lol.

    What T5s and halides were you using?

    That depends on the reflector to a large degree. The more narrow the reflector, the more narrowly focused it will be and deeper the penetration. Albeit not have as much horizontal coverage.

    +1 The Bulb combos are really great. With some T&E you can get pretty close to whatever color you want, generrally speaking w/ T5s.

    Don't lump all T5s together-like a generic "T5s DROOL/MH RULES GO TEAM!!" If you say one is better than the other, please be specific (bulb, reflector, # of bulbs, ballast, cooling, height above tank ect.) With T5 combos, reflectors and fixtures there can be as much difference between them as "a hundai and a vette," oddyssa vs. ATI or Icecap for example. Until I see someone that has solid PAR readings, coral growth rates and energy savings statistics from a perfectly controlled experiment, I'm not believing that either type of lighting is vastly better than the other- not just trash talking T5s or MH.

    It really is like apples to oranges. There is a huge variation even within the two groups. Some people had a bad apple, and then a good orange. Suddenly all apples are crap and oranges kick their sorry red arses any day of the week, when they never had one of these- Japanese apples I upgraded from PC to MH and went back because I hated it. It was the cheapest MH retro I could find and melted my center brace. Is PC better than MH? Yes, in that instance, w/ that shaped tank and that supposed "cooling" system. Is it generall though?

    In short, you probably could use T5s in a 30" tank, IMO. Just have more bulbs and high quality narrow reflectors. More bulbs would cancel out the benefit of cheaper bulb replacement costs with t5s though. But, it would be more energy efficient (*probably*) and have more customizable color options. I also don't know how gun-ho you are on the shimmer effect...

    If you go MH, you could try a lower kelvin (3 250W iwasaki 65s maybe?) and have some florescents to blue it out. Like actinic VHOs or ATI blue+. Theres a local reefer that runs that combo; the growth and color is outstanding.
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2009