Can I daisy chain a phosban and carbon reactor together??

Discussion in 'Filters, Pumps, etc..' started by jkat21, Nov 10, 2009.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. jkat21

    jkat21 Bangghai Cardinal

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,379
    Location:
    S.I. N.Y
    I have two 2lf`s reactors,one I use for GFO (low flow). and another I would like to run carbon in...
    1 st ,The carbon has to be at what kind of flow(high)
    2 nd ,If the above is true can they be daisy chained together, the carbon first going into the GFO (slowed down)then into the sump????
    I would like to keep it clean looking and they will be fed from my return(mag 9.5)..
    If this is possible or not, any info or suggestions would be helpful...8)

    TIA
     
  2. Click Here!

  3. bama

    bama Humpback Whale

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,788
    Location:
    Houston, TEXAS
    yes.. do it.. also put the carbon after the phosphate reactor..
     
  4. bama

    bama Humpback Whale

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,788
    Location:
    Houston, TEXAS
    oh and only control the flow going into the 1st reactor as causing back pressure on a reactor is never good..
     
  5. jkat21

    jkat21 Bangghai Cardinal

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,379
    Location:
    S.I. N.Y
    really why??

    Ok,,Yea I was only going to control the first reactor anyway though the other would just drain out......lol dont need to blow one up lol
     
  6. Powerman

    Powerman Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,460
    Location:
    Colorado
    So the carbon can help catch the fines from the GFO.
     
  7. jkat21

    jkat21 Bangghai Cardinal

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,379
    Location:
    S.I. N.Y
    Ahhh after you said this,the light went off lol..gotcha, thanks...
     
  8. Click Here!

  9. jkat21

    jkat21 Bangghai Cardinal

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,379
    Location:
    S.I. N.Y
    If the GFO is first(w/low flow) wont the flow be to low for carbon??(was under the impression it had to have high flow)
    also how much should I fill the reactor with carbon??
     
  10. Powerman

    Powerman Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    3,460
    Location:
    Colorado
    It is what it is. There are trade offs. Carbon does not "need" High" flow. It can just handle it. The flow for the GFO is going to be the limiting factor. First or last the flow throught the reactor will be the same. but since the GFO "need" the right flow to make it tumble, might as well have the carbon last to catch fines from the tumbling GFO.

    The amount is going to depend on your directions. The GFO will last longer than the GAC. I am going to just put half batches in and change every two weeks. My carbon directions say to run 3-4 weeks. My GFO says 4-8. So I am simply going to try and figure out what two weeks would be and figure it that way. That is all I'm going by.
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. unclejed

    unclejed Whip-Lash Squid

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,964
    Location:
    Clinton Township, Michigan
  12. Screwtape

    Screwtape Tonozukai Fairy Wrasse

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    2,289
    Everything I've read says GFO requires higher flow than carbon. You want the GFO to be slightly tumbling in the reactor so it doesn't cake up, carbon you generally don't want moving too much or it can break up and produce carbon dust which can get into the tank (not necessarily a bad thing but can cause problems in large amounts I believe).

    Your mileage may vary depending on what exact products you are using (what type of carbon and where you get the GFO).

    There's some info out here with some various types of each product:
    Bulk packaged Granular ferric oxide GFO for aquariums - English
    Bulk packaged carbon for aquariums - English