Cycling with base rock and dry sand

Discussion in 'New To The Hobby' started by Bunner, Feb 15, 2009.

to remove this notice and enjoy 3reef content with less ads. 3reef membership is free.

  1. Bunner

    Bunner Bubble Tip Anemone

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    684
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    If I have only dry argonite only 30 lbs of lr and 50 lbs of base rock will i go through a cycle? essentially they isn't anything to cycle with..... or am i wrong?

    for the past week i have had about 0.5 ammonia is that normal at the start? ive been waiting to see a spike or something, but still nothing:-/
     
  2. Click Here!

  3. GuitarMan89

    GuitarMan89 Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2008
    Messages:
    5,736
    Location:
    Wilmington, DE
    If you have ammonia in the tank, then you should be fine. The ammonia will feed the bacteria needed. I have cycled with base rock before without any problems. Even the driest and best cleaned rock has organic material stuck within it.
     
  4. techno2

    techno2 Stylophora

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    959
    I believe you will need a bit more to get it really going. Some use hardy fish like a Damsel, some use Shrimp pieces or something. Not sure if dry sand and base rock will get you where you want to be. I have had luck with adding Colonize tot he Sump / Fuge to kick start the Bio Filter, but I did start with LR from a older setup.

    Best thing is to chart the 3 tests, Amonia, Nitrite, and Nitrate and you will know when it happens. Should take about 8 weeks give or take, but still think you need something to juspstart the process.

    BTW, Diggin the setup.


    Cheers
     
  5. Bunner

    Bunner Bubble Tip Anemone

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    684
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    thanks! I don't know a single thing from reading about the cycle....other then how and what is broken down.

    I've been itching to actually get into this thing going since last year april! now i have to hurry up and slow down HA!!
     
  6. techno2

    techno2 Stylophora

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2007
    Messages:
    959
    That is the biggest mistake everyone that fails makes. It is hard, you see all the pics of well established tanks and you just want to get some of it started.

    Resist the urge...



    These are good informative easy reads

    Beginner FAQ: The Nitrogen Cycle

    The Nitrogen Cycle

    The Aquarium Nitrogen Cycle


    As well as many many threads and links on this here site...


    Cheers.

    Whos sig is it.. " Go Slow, Let it Grow "
    says it all..
     
  7. Otty

    Otty Giant Squid

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    6,467
    Location:
    Elizabethtown, IN
    I would put 2 cups of established sand in the tank to help get bacteria started if you know someone with a reputable tank. I always add 1 yellow tail damsel to get the bacteria up and keep it stable in the tank during cycle. With everything being base and not live I would cycle the tank close to 12 weeks. Bet that is not what you wanted to hear.. :)
     
  8. Click Here!

  9. Bunner

    Bunner Bubble Tip Anemone

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    Messages:
    684
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    HA 12 weeks! thats nothing... i have had the tank for 4 months in my living room without anything...even water. Yes that is sad, but true. I ve been taking my sweet time and buying some of the good equipment to start out.
     
  10. Tangster

    Tangster 3reef Sponsor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,644
    Location:
    Va/Ct
    Well I'd get the salinity correct ten add that one just one yellow tailed blue Damsel and set back feed it lightly every few day and spend the 12 weeks getting the water quality stable and correct.. I never use L.Rock or sand myself I always apply the old sand from a trusted healthy system like Otty suggested to get the sand fauna seeded .
     
  11. JasonSquared

    JasonSquared Spaghetti Worm

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    197
    Location:
    Rochester NY
    I've posted this elsewhere on this forum quite some time ago, but I thought that it might be good to post again. It would have been GREAT to have when I was starting out. So I'll post it in case someone is just starting and wants some quality information from Eric Borneman.

    Tank maturity seems to be even more of an issue without the sand bed. The sand bed just takes some time to get enough nutrients in it to sustain populations and stratify into somewhat stable communities and become functional. So, here's the tank reason, and then I'll blow into some ecology for you. When you get a tank, you start with no populations of anything. You get live rock to form the basis of the biodiversity - and remember that virtually everything is moderated by bacteria and photosynthesis in our tanks. So liverock is the substrate for all these processes, and also has a lot of life on it. How much depends on a lot of things.

    Mostly, marine animals and plants don’t like to be out of water for a day at a time...much less the many days to sometimes a week that often happens. So, assuming you are not using existing rock from a tank, or the well-treated aquacultured stuff, you have live rock that is either relatively free of anything alive to begin with, or you have live rock with a few stragglers and a whole lot of stuff dying or about to die because it won’t survive in the tank. Some, if not most, rock exporters have a “curing process” that gets rid of a lot of the life to begin with and some of this is to keep it from dying and fouling further, but some of it would have lived if treated more carefully.

    From the moment you start, you are in the negative. Corallines will be dying, sponges, dead worms and crustaceans and echinoids and bivalves, many of which are in the rock and you won't ever see. Not to mention the algae, cyanobacteria, and bacteria, most of which is dehydrated, dead or dying, and will decompose. This is where the existing bacteria get kick started. Bacteria grow really fast, and so they are able to grow to levels that are capable of uptaking nitrogen within...well, the cycling time of a few weeks to a month or so. The “starter bacteria” products give me a chuckle. Anyone with a passing knowledge of microbiology would realize that for a product to contain live bacteria in a medium that sustains it would quickly turn into a nearly solid mass of bacteria, and if the medium is such that it keeps them inactive, then the amount of bacteria in a bottle is like adding a grain of salt to the ocean compared to what is going to happen quickly in a tank with live rock in it.

    However, if you realize the doubling time of these bugs, you would know that in a month, you should have a tank packed full of bacteria and no room for water. That means something is killing or eating bacteria. Also realize that if you have a tank with constant decomposition happening at a rate high enough to spike ammonia off the scale, you have a lot of bacteria food...way more than you will when things stop dying off and decomposing. So, bacterial growth may have caught up with the level of nitrogen being produced, but things are still dying...you just test zero for ammonia because there are enough bacteria present to keep up with the nitrogen being released by the dying stuff. It does not necessarily mean things are finished decomposing or that ammonia is not being produced.

    Now, if things are decomposing, they are releasing more than ammonia. Guess what dead sponges release? All their toxic metabolites. Guess what else? All their natural antibiotic compounds which prevents some microbes from doing very well. Same with the algae, the inverts, the cyano, the dinoflagellates, etc. They all produce things that can be toxic – and sometimes toxic to things we want, and sometimes to things we don’t want. So, let's just figure this death and decomposition is going take a while.

    OK, so now we have a tank packed with some kinds of bacteria, probably not much of others. Eventually the death stops. Now, what happens to all that biomass of bacteria without a food source? They die. Some continue on at an equilibrium level with the amount of nutrients available. And, denitrification is a slow process. Guess what else? Bacteria also have antibiotics, toxins, etc. all released when they die. But, the die-off is slow, relative to the loss of nutrients, and there is already a huge population, and yet you never test ammonia. "The water tests fine.” But, all these swings are happening. Swings of death, followed by growth until limited, then death again, then nutrients available for growth, and then limitation and death. But, every time, they get less and less, but they keep happening – even in mature tanks. Eventually, they slow and stabilize.

    What's left? A tank with limited denitrification (because its slow and aerobic things happen fast) and a whole lot of other stuff in the water. Who comes to the rescue and thrives during these cycles? The next fastest growing groups...cyanobacteria, single celled algae, protists, ciliates, etc. Then they do their little cycle thing. And then the turf algae take advantage of the nutrients (the hair algae stage). Turfs get mowed down by all the little amphipods that are suddenly springing up because they have a food source. Maybe you've bought some snails by now, too, or a fish. And the fish dies, of course, because it may not have ammonia to contend with, but is has water filled with things we can't and don't test for...plus, beginning aquarists usually skimp on lights and pumps initially, and haven't figured out that alkalinity test, so pH and O2 are probably swinging wildly at this point.

    So, the algae successions kick in, and eventually you have a good algal biomass that handles nitrogen, produces oxygen through photosynthesis, takes up the metabolic CO2 of all the other heterotrophs you can’t see, the bacteria have long settled in and also deal with nutrients, and the aquarium keeper has probably stopped adding fish for a spell because they keep dying. Maybe they started to visit boards and read books and get the knack of the tank a bit. They have probably also added a bunch of fix-it-quick chemicals that didn’t help any, either. Also, they are probably scared to add corals that would actually help with the photosynthesis and nutrient uptake, or they have packed in corals that aren't tolerant of those conditions.

    About a year into it, the sand bed is productive and has stratified, water quality is stable, and the aquarist has bought a few more powerheads, understands water quality a bit, corallines and algae, if not corals and other things are photosynthesizing well, and the tank is "mature." That's when fish stop dying when you buy them (at least the cyanide free ones) and corals start to live and grow and I stop getting posts about "I just bought a coral and its dying and my tank is two months old" and they start actually answering some questions here and there instead of just asking questions (though we should all always be asking questions, if not only to ourselves!).

    So, ecologically, this is successional population dynamics. Its normal, and it happens when there is a hurricane or a fire, or whatever. In nature though, you have pioneer species that are eventually replaced by climax communities. We usually try and stock immediately with climax species. And find it doesn't always work.

    Now, the "too mature" system is the old tank syndrome. Happens in nature, too. That whole forest fire reinvigorating the system is true. Equally true on coral reefs where the intermediate disturbance hypothesis is the running thought on why coral reefs maintain very high diversity...they are stable, but not too stable, and require storms, but not catastrophic ones....predation, but not a giant blanket of crown of thorns, mass bleaching, or loss of key herbivores.

    This goes to show what good approximations these tanks are of mini-ecosystems. Things happen much faster in tanks, but what do you expect given the bioload per unit area. So, our climax community happens in a couple years rather than a couple of centuries. Thing is, I am fully convinced that intermediate tank disturbance would prevent old tank syndrome.

    My advice on starting tanks is to plan the habitat you want. Find the animals and corals you like. Learn about the tiny area of the reef you will try and recreate, and do not try to make a whole coral reef in one tank. Then, purchase the equipment required to emulate that environment. Then, add the appropriate types of substrate (sand, rubble, rock, whatever) and wait long after “your tank water tests fine” before you add fish and corals. First, add herbivores and maintain water quality. Water changes, carbon, skimming, alkalinity, calcium. Keep the water of high quality, even for things you can’t test for. Wait a few months and enjoy the growth that will happen. Then, add some of the species that you plan to keep….invertebrates and corals. They help create the environment, and also photosynthesize, add biodiversity, stabilize nutrients, etc. Then….then….add fish. The fish will have a reef as their new home. They won’t be stressed by this variable bouilllabaise of water and a strange habitat that keeps changing as things are added or die. They will have a stable tank with real habitat, and then the original concept you imagined will have happened.
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. ChrisBs

    ChrisBs Purple Spiny Lobster

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    Messages:
    488
    Location:
    Melbourne , Australia
    wow im reall glad i read that man im not exactly new to this hobby been in about 3 years now up to tank three but i did all the dumb stuff he wrote there lol first tank was one of those ones with the filter in the lid just a little sponge thing and a tiny bag of ceramic noodles lol now im onto a 370 litre 95 gallon custom set up that has been running for a bout a year now really starting to get the nack of it nothing has died in about 4 moths YAY..