» 3reef Navigation | | | » Forum Menu | | | » Aquarium Ads | | |   And here too! |  | |
02-03-2007, 08:00 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Bristle Worm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 148
Karma: 48

| It seems T5 is a little more $ than PC. But sounds very worth it.
I have to get off here for a bit but will be back. Thanks Birchell |
| | | Reef Links | |
02-04-2007, 12:32 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Bristle Worm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 148
Karma: 48

| OK It appears that most or all "24" PC are (2 X 65 watts, 130 watts total) $132.95 for (Currant USA)
And "24" T5 comes in either (4 X 24 watts 96 watts, total) or (6 X 24 watts, 144 watts total)
4 X 24 = 96 watts $189.95 for (Aqua Medic)
6 X 24 =144 watts $264.95 for (Aqua Medic)
So, watt for watt T5 cost more. However supposedly watt for watt T5 produces more lumen's. I guess my first question would be (How many watts is to much for a tank that is 24L X 18D X 21T) ? Assuming 144 watts would be best for this tank, I would then ask is the extra $132.00 worth the extra 14 watts you would gain by using the (6 X 24 T5) over the (2 X65 PC) ? |
| |
02-04-2007, 11:52 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Spaghetti Worm
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: San Pedro,CA Age: 25
Posts: 184
| I wouldent think so man, watt's are watt's no matter what light they are coming out of. the spectrum and colour would be the difference. IMO your not going to get a substancial difference in growth with the extra 14 watts, especially for the price! I am a big fan of the pc lights on small tanks but i know allot of people will argue me
Good luck!
-Jordan |
| |
02-04-2007, 12:38 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Eyelash Blennie
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Lakeland, Fl
Posts: 1,294
| A Watt is a measure of power consumed, not the amount light produced. Lumens and Lux is a measure of light ouput and PAR or PPFD is a measure of usable light output for photosynthesis. T5 HO's have more light output per watt than PC's.
If it was my money I would go with the T5 HO's, less heat than the metal halides and more light than the PC's. JMHO
Good luck with either choice
Jim
_________
90 Gallon glass, 135#'s of rock and 2" sand. 2-250w 20k XM metal halides. 2-95 watt actinic VHO, 4 powerheads, Coralife skimmer. Maroon Gold Striped Clown, Blue Chromis, Kole Tang, Pygmy Angel, Serpent Star, Brittle Star,Gorgonians, Mushrooms, Yellow Polyps, Turbo Snails & Blue Legged Hermits. 20 gal sump with Caulerpa, Mag 7 return pump.
Last edited by Diver_1298; 02-04-2007 at 01:05 PM.
Reason: clarification
|
| |
02-04-2007, 08:35 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Bristle Worm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 148
Karma: 48

| Guess I am going to bat this one around for a while. Thank you every one for your input. |
| |
02-05-2007, 12:43 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Bristle Worm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 148
Karma: 48

| I really want to explore all of my options, and there are many options apparently lol. And am now thinking about MH again. Question is what wattage for a MH would be a good choice for softies LPS and some SPS? As a reminder the tank in mind is a 37 gallon tank with a 20 gallon sump. The tank is 21 inches tall. I was thinking 150 watts may be best. Or perhaps 70 watt MH with a couple 24 watt T5. All suggestions are welcome, thanks. |
| |
02-05-2007, 09:41 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Gigas Clam
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Miami,Florida Age: 21
Posts: 864
| i would go with 250 watts retrofit metal halide if you wanna make a tall canopy. You can find in ebay for cheap. If no tall canopy whanted, those mh fixtures talked about above are good, just pricey. So the next best option, (and my favorite) is the t5's. JMHO _________ *Since 12/2002 40 gal. 85 lbs live rock. 3" fiji Live sand.wet dry filter and prizm protein skimmer. 192 power compacts
*Since 10/2006 125 gal. Built in Overflows x2, 3" LS(165 lb fiji pink) 175 lb of LR, 2x 36" aquatinics T5 HO fixtures(10x39W bulbs 2 gliesman aquablue+1 gliesman actinic+2 ATI aquablue special), mag 18 return pump, PM R30fuge. AquaC EV 180 skimmer.
**Working on CL with 2 4mdqx-sc little giants and a OM Super Squirt. http://www.3reef.com/uploads/turbo3.jpg |
| |
02-05-2007, 11:43 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Bristle Worm
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 148
Karma: 48

| Thanks alot guys for the ideahs. I looked at them all. The sunpod is a very nice setup, but a little pricey as mentioned. From a value perpective, which is important to me, the 250 watt retro is a great deal for the wattage. I am inclined to go with that and make a DIY canopy. Although I'm a little worried that 250 watts may be to much. I do not wish to use a chiller. Think this tank can maintain decent temps with a 250 watt retro MH? This is the kicker for me. As I have never used one before. If my system were to have say 34 gallons of actuall water due to sand rock pumps ect. That would be 7.3 watts per gallon. Ofcourse I realize that method is a rule of thumb. Now where do I stand. LOL Usually in the summer I keep the house temp around 78... So think 250 watts is ok, or think 175 might be better? |
| |
02-06-2007, 08:32 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Gigas Clam
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Miami,Florida Age: 21
Posts: 864
| Okay, the next two weeks, ima be building a canopy and installing a 250 watt retro mh and 2 96watt atnics pc's for my 40gal. breeder. I am going to placed maybe 4 fans on the canopy. Right now my water has a stable temperature of 77 degrees. and in the summer usually 78-79. Im calculating maybe a 1 degree or two diferent in my tank. But ima be giving it maybe 1' off the top of the tank. I dont think ima have a problem, lets see. |
| | | Reef Links | |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |