Main Menu
|
Get on the Map!
|
Forum Menu
| |
06-28-2005, 07:57 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Whip-Lash Squid
Join Date: May 2004 Location: PhillySuburbs, Pennsylvania Age: 42
Posts: 2,947
| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? Sponges over the strainers.... _________  I Love My Sig By John Hawkins!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Date Started 9/04 58 gallon Oceanic Tank, 20 gal DIY sump/fuge w/ Kent Marine Auto top-off, Air Water Ice RO/DI, 10,000 K 175 W MH, 2 VHO 03's 96W each, AquaC EV 120 Skimmer
80 lbs LR, DSB in FUGE, 1 - 2 " LS in tank
Black Brittle Star, Chevron Tang, Crocea Clam, red & green Lobophyllia, Frogspawn, Porites Frag, Caulastrea Frag, Green Ricordia, Asst. Zoas, hermits, astreas, stomatellas, fighting conch |
| | | Reef Links | |
06-28-2005, 09:26 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Plankton
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 5
Karma: 1

| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? Thanks for all the input everyone. OK, I'll remove the power heads from the uplift tubes (and probably take them off) - the undergravel plates/grates being under there and just not used shouldn't hurt anything though would it?
Also, any thoughts on the amount of flow I've got with my current power heads? Too much? Not enough?
_________
55 gallon tank with wet/dry. 1 penguin 660 power head and 1 penguin 1440 power head. Approximately 50 lbs live rock. Aqualight 260 W PC lights. Protein Skimmer. |
| |
06-28-2005, 09:30 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Whip-Lash Squid
Join Date: May 2004 Location: PhillySuburbs, Pennsylvania Age: 42
Posts: 2,947
| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? Hehe! You can never have tooooo much flow! LOL!
I have an 800 gph overflow and return and use 2 Tunze turbelles (500+gph each) running full out in my tank! (58 gallon)! Funny thing is, when you stick your hand in the tank, it does not feel like all that much! |
| |
06-28-2005, 11:39 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Spaghetti Worm
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Denver, CO,Colorado
Posts: 178
Karma: 10

| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? Birdlady, had a question about one of your comments... You said the wet/dry was good for the eel who was a heavy producer of waste. If DanS was going to have 5 or 6 fish, wouldn't he/she want to beable to handle a high amount of waste from the 5 or 6 fish and thus want to keep the wet/dry and bioballs?
The reason I ask is that I'm in the process of removing my bio balls, but also have 5 fish currently in my 55 gallon. Why is the skimmer more important in the case of fish over the eel? Just trying to understand for my own situation. Thanks! Again, sorry if I seem to be taking over your post DanS.
_________
55 gal glass tank, 2 power heads, wet/dry filter, protein skimmer, 50 lbs live rock, pair of tomato clowns, 1 royal gramma, 1 coral beauty angel, 1 six line wrasse, 1 peppermint shrimp, 1 skunk cleaner shrimp, 12 assorted snails (astrea/turbo), 15 assorted hermit crabs, green bubble tip anemone, red mushrooms, yellow polyps, 1 green leather, green star polyps, yellow toadstool |
| |
06-28-2005, 03:33 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Vlamingii Tang
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,888
Karma: 425

| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? I still have the bio balls in my wet dry IMO The reason for the nitrates building in the wet/dry with the bio balls is either not using pre-filter media in the filter tray or not changing it enough, Letting uneaten food to get trapped in the bio balls and decay causing a rise in nitrates. JMO John |
| |
06-28-2005, 04:02 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Whip-Lash Squid
Join Date: May 2004 Location: PhillySuburbs, Pennsylvania Age: 42
Posts: 2,947
| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? OK, here is the deal.....
Food/Poop ------> Ammonia (by decaying and bacteria and whatnot)
Ammonia-------> Nitrites (by ammonia eating bacteria leaving nitrite as a waste...this bacteria is Aerobic or needs oxygen to perform this function)
Nitrites------->Nitrate (by nitrite eating bacteria leaving nitrate as a waste product, this also needs oxygen to occur)
now, here is the rub.....
Nitrate------->Harmless nitrogen gas which bubbles up out of the tank (now this nitrite eating bacteria is Anaerobic, needs lack of oxygen to perform its function)
When you have bioballs, generally they are exposed to water and ...AIR....leaving only area for Aerobic bacteria to grow. Where are the anaerobic bacteria in a wet/dry? There usually isn't much.
IF all your bioballs are submerged, completely underwater, you get fewer nitrates because the aerobic process is not as efficient.....the anaerobic process in the rock and sand can keep up. But I still think you would get higher nitrates eventually. Which means more water changes.
Now, the skimmer.....It REMOVES alot of the proteins and waste from the water BEFORE it turns into ammonia.....which translates to less ammonia, less nitrates, and less nitrates in the end....
I hope this helps a little.....
Nitrates are not so bad for fish as they are for corals and inverts...so that is why a wet/dry is OK for a heavy FO population....it is not that good in a reef aquarium where you want as close to nutrient free water as possible. |
| |
06-28-2005, 04:13 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Vlamingii Tang
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,888
Karma: 425

| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? My ammonia , Nitrates and nitrites are 0 But I do have a DSB 4 1/2" 80 lbs of LR and a refugium so that may also be a factor. John |
| |
06-28-2005, 05:54 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Whip-Lash Squid
Join Date: May 2004 Location: PhillySuburbs, Pennsylvania Age: 42
Posts: 2,947
| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? Quote: |
Originally Posted by fletch I still have the bio balls in my wet dry IMO The reason for the nitrates building in the wet/dry with the bio balls is either not using pre-filter media in the filter tray or not changing it enough, Letting uneaten food to get trapped in the bio balls and decay causing a rise in nitrates. JMO John |
Well, your husbandry helps too! Removing waste before it can decay definetly helps!!!  And the sandbed!
Like I said, more than one way to skin a cat!! |
| |
06-29-2005, 08:56 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Plankton
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 5
Karma: 1

| Re: Does this new tank setup sound OK? You guys must get sick of repeating this stuff over and over again... Sorry about that. So, is the general consensus that it's better to not have the bio balls in the wet dry as long as you have sufficient live rock and sand? The idea being that the rock and probably more so the sand bed would be where the anerobic nitrate to nitrogen gas conversion would happen? Just making sure I understand how I need to get things setup and running. I assume, by using the undergravel uplifts for the power heads, I would in essence be pulling oxygenated water through the sand bed, thus not allowing for this anerobic process to take place, thus creating a build up of nitrates. Right? |
| | | Reef Links | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:57 PM. |