Main Menu
|
Get on the Map!
|
Forum Menu
| |
05-11-2008, 10:37 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Skunk Shrimp
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Baltimore, md
Posts: 250
| sump vs Fluval 204 I have a fluval 204 on my 20 tall with a sump. My question, is it a good idea to have both on the tank or one? If so which of the two is the bests to have the fluval or the sump?
I was thinking of keeping the fluval and changing the 10 gal sump over to a sick tank or a sponge tank. |
| | | Reef Links | |
05-11-2008, 10:43 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Panda Puffer
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Sun River,Oregon (Bend) Age: 35
Posts: 2,106
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Rawdogz I have a fluval 204 on my 20 tall with a sump. My question, is it a good idea to have both on the tank or one? If so which of the two is the bests to have the fluval or the sump?
I was thinking of keeping the fluval and changing the 10 gal sump over to a sick tank or a sponge tank. | I would keep the sump. I keep my fluval for emergency vacumming purposes. Do you have nitrate issues with your canister filter? _________ |
| |
05-11-2008, 11:49 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Skunk Shrimp
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Baltimore, md
Posts: 250
| no issue with it |
| |
05-11-2008, 11:59 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Panda Puffer
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Sun River,Oregon (Bend) Age: 35
Posts: 2,106
| My personal preference would be to keep the sump. There is alot of room for up-grading your system with the sump. Turning a small section into a refugium, hiding equipment etc. . If you are happy with the combo or, just the canister and it's doing the job. Then leave it alone. |
| |
05-11-2008, 01:15 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Gigas Clam
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Quebec City
Posts: 894
| I would go for the sump
what are you running in the flurval? _________
55gl skimmerless, 80lbs live rock, DIY wavemaker running 3x MJ1200 with hydor deflector.
2 DIY fluidized reactors Carbon & ROWAphos
LIghts- 2x 50/50 atinics T10's , 2x life gro T10's ,
1x20,000K T12, 1x6,000K T10.
Fish-3
Coral-13. |
| |
05-11-2008, 05:21 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Skunk Shrimp
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Baltimore, md
Posts: 250
| a friend gave it to me a few month back, he had it on his 90 gal salt tank. so i really don't know what he has in it i will crack it open and see what is inside |
| |
05-11-2008, 09:24 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: rocklin
Posts: 907
| if you just wanted one or the other, i would go with the sump as well. |
| |
05-11-2008, 09:33 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Montipora Capricornis
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: CT Age: 28
Posts: 1,034
| Keep the fluval for your carbon/biomax/phosphate removers. I've found it's easy to maintain them in there, and they get flow pumped directly through the media. _________ |
| |
05-12-2008, 12:37 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Skunk Shrimp
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Baltimore, md
Posts: 250
| I was thinking,( am still 50/50). I still have to get overflow and the return pump, I was thinking of putting that money with some more and get a stronger light ( T5 or T6) and keep the fluval, what are your input on that idea?
also
I plan on have about 30lb of liverock. |
| | | Reef Links | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:38 PM. |