Click Here!
Promote! | Advertise | View Sponsors | Top100
Welcome to 3reef.com, the friendly tropical fish forum community where reef aquarium enthusiasts from around the world come to discuss coral reef aquariums, saltwater fish, corals, inverts, protein skimmers, fish filters, aquarium lighting, refugiums, etc. Also freshwater fish information on tetras, goldfish, cichlids and more!

You are currently viewing 3reef.com as a guest which gives you limited access to view most tropical fish forum discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photo gallery and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
Go Back   3reef Forums > Off Topic > Environmental

Old 10-13-2003, 09:29 AM   #1 (permalink)
KingFish
 
Matt Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pt. Richmond, Ca.
Age: 38
Posts: 7,419
Blog Entries: 3
Karma: 2982
Matt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond repute


 
 
 
 
Send a message via MSN to Matt Rogers Send a message via Skype™ to Matt Rogers
Default Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

Well they wouldn't admit anything until somebody sued them. Go figure..



Report: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales
Monday, October 13, 2003 Posted: 2:26 PM EDT (1826 GMT)

http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science....ap/index.html


SAN FRANCISCO, California (AP) -- The Navy has agreed to limit its peacetime use of a new sonar system designed to detect enemy submarines, but which may also harm marine mammals and fish, an environmentalist group said.

The Navy and the Natural Resources Defense Council, which sued the military on the issue, reached a legal settlement last week in which the Navy agreed to use the new system only in specific areas along the eastern seaboard of Asia, according to documents provided by the environmental group.

The agreement must be approved by a federal magistrate to become permanent, but if implemented the deal would greatly restrict the Navy's original plan for the sonar system, which once was slated to be tested in most of the world's oceans.

Navy officials familiar with the case could not immediately be reached for comment.

Environmentalists say sonar systems endanger marine mammals and fish, especially whales. They point to a different system the Navy used in 2000, when at least 16 whales and two dolphins beached themselves on islands in the Bahamas. Eight whales died and scientists found hemorrhaging around their brains and ear bones, which could have been caused by exposure to loud noise.

Last year the Natural Resources Defense Council and other environmental groups sued the Navy over the new system, seeking to restrict its use.

U.S. Magistrate Elizabeth Laporte later issued a preliminary injunction restricting use of the system, and in a separate ruling ordered the environmentalists and the Navy to negotiate a final settlement.

The new deal, which is the result of those negotiations, largely mirrors the restrictions imposed by Laporte's earlier injunction.

Joel Reynolds, director of the Marine Mammal Protection Project at the Natural Resources Defense Council, welcomed the settlement.

"This agreement safeguards both marine life and national security," Reynolds said in a statement. "It will prevent the needless injury, harassment, and death of countless whales, porpoises and fish, and yet allow the Navy to do what is necessary to defend our country."

In addition to restricting the system to the eastern seaboard of Asia, the Navy also agreed to seasonal restrictions designed to protect whale migrations, and to avoid using the system near the coast.

None of the restrictions applies during time of war.


_________

Go slow, let it grow.


3reef shirts here!
Help Me with unanwered posts!
Promote!
Create reef videos and add them to 3reef! Join the 3reef YouTube Group!


20 long (9/04 - 8/06) with DIY Rock, 70 Watt HQI Halide x 2 24 watt T5 actinics, Aqua Medic Turboflotor Multi Skimmer, Tunze Turbelle 7200 powerhead.
Matt Rogers is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reef Links
Click Here!
Old 10-15-2003, 07:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
Pajama Cardinal
 
karlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: berwick, PA,Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,445
Karma: 108
karlas has helped out a lot around herekarlas has helped out a lot around here


 
 
 
Default Re: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

no one admits anything until they dont know where to go with it. maby they need to start trying to design some other type of tracking systen. maby some type of electronic waves instead of sound waves if its possible to transmit them thru water


_________

karla75 gall, 80 lbs sand, 110 lb lr, 10k pcs, atinics, emperor 400, prizm skimmer, hagen and maxi jet powerheads
karlas is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2003, 03:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
KingFish
 
Matt Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Pt. Richmond, Ca.
Age: 38
Posts: 7,419
Blog Entries: 3
Karma: 2982
Matt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Rogers has a reputation beyond repute


 
 
 
 
Send a message via MSN to Matt Rogers Send a message via Skype™ to Matt Rogers
Default Re: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

Hmm... two massive whale beachings this week...

100+ in Austrailia

36 in St. Martin

WHERE ARE THE SUBS? *[smiley=shifty.gif]


Matt Rogers is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2003, 01:59 AM   #4 (permalink)
Pajama Cardinal
 
karlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: berwick, PA,Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,445
Karma: 108
karlas has helped out a lot around herekarlas has helped out a lot around here


 
 
 
Default Re: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

thats amazing that so many whales beached themselved i wonder if they will ever find out the real reason this happens. maby its sort of like the lemming the small animals that run to the ocean and jump off the cliffs in large groups and they drown themselves maby there is a similar reason behind both
karlas is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2004, 09:22 AM   #5 (permalink)
Giant Squid
 
Craig Manoukian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marina del Rey, California
Posts: 3,524
Karma: 258
Craig Manoukian will become famous soon enoughCraig Manoukian will become famous soon enoughCraig Manoukian will become famous soon enough


 
 
Default Re: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

Bummer, good info., but still a bummer![/b]


_________

Just tryin to recreate God's perfection in a glass bowl. 20 Gallon Reef W/Live Rock, mated pair of Maroon Clowns, Softies, 110 watts PC 10,000k lighting, and skimmer.
Craig Manoukian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2004, 04:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Sea Dragon
 
Phil5613's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
Posts: 524
Karma: 41
Phil5613 is on a roll


 
 
Send a message via AIM to Phil5613 Send a message via Yahoo to Phil5613
Default Re: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

My wife was reading this over my shoulder and her theory on the whale beachings was that they must be male whales and wouldn't stop for directions GRRRRRRRR! LOL


_________

Starting over with a 210 RR from All Glass, Lifereef Berlin sump, skimmer (installed) and calcium reactor (ordered). Aquatraders Catalina 72" 3x400 mh 10 k/4x96 watt blue PC, Closed Loop with Little Giant 4MDQX-SC and 2- 3/4 Seaswirls.
Phil5613 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 09:31 AM   #7 (permalink)
Kole Tang
 
Gresham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SF/Monterey Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,750
Karma: 104
Gresham has helped out a lot around hereGresham has helped out a lot around here


 
Default Re: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

Quote:
WHERE ARE THE SUBS?
Uh, thats what they're trying to find with the sonar, Matt. What gets me is they all ready have an insane tracking system. From what has been released, they can track a boat as small as 10 feet and can id each boat by its prop noise's. Australia can tell when a small craft enters the highly protected GBR, how they able to do that? Does that device cause breeches of whales? Did it cause the ones Matt mentioned?

Karla, I'm not a scientist, but I don't think at the levels needed that anything would be cool for the wildlife. If they employeed electrical waves a whole slew of other animals would perish, ie. sharks or any animal that uses electrical fields (emfs?) to hunt. Our military tested a device that employeed microwaves in the little Panama war we had to get whats his face, uh, Noriega. It melted soldiers (not our soldiers) to their weapons, not a pretty site. My buddy was in that squirmish and he said it was insane what that weapon could do. Not a Geneva Convention appoved weapon, I'm sure


_________

Gresham
__________________________________...
Feeding the reef... one polyp at a time...
Gresham is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 03:07 AM   #8 (permalink)
Pajama Cardinal
 
karlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: berwick, PA,Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,445
Karma: 108
karlas has helped out a lot around herekarlas has helped out a lot around here


 
 
 
Default Re: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

that sounds like it was pretty nasty especially melting them to there weapons that would be very painful.
karlas is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 08:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
Kole Tang
 
Gresham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SF/Monterey Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,750
Karma: 104
Gresham has helped out a lot around hereGresham has helped out a lot around here


 
Default Re: Navy to limit sonar to protect whales

Yah, I sure wouldn't want to be on the opposite end of that weapon.

Outboard motors and metal props are attacked all the time by sharks due to confusion from the electrical signals (emf?) given off.
Gresham is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reef Links
Click Here!
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0,
----
All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.
All forum posts are the property of the posters. All else © 1996-2008, 3reef.com LLC.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74
Vote for 3reef!
(Clicking these counts as a vote)


And here too!