View Single Post
Old 06-20-2006, 01:24 PM   #11 (permalink)
Blade_Runner
Gigas Clam
 
Blade_Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Carpentersville, IL
Age: 52
Posts: 874
Karma: 137
Blade_Runner has helped out a lot around hereBlade_Runner has helped out a lot around here


 
 
Default

I saw a couple threads on them on RC beyond the one's you had. Supposedly, there was a preproduction dart and some sort of industry show a month or so ago. They seem like they will rock for LARGE applications!

In my simplistic mind, the only real difference between Beckett and NW applications is where the venturi is located. A Beckett is a type of venturi placed into the flow after the pump. A NW has the venturi placed in front of the pump allowing the pump to "chop" the foam into smaller bubbles.

After all is said and done, I'm not sure that one has a real advantage over another. I like the idea of chopping up the air/water mix, but that makes the pump less efficient. Conversely, the same pump may be able to more efficiently drive a Beckett. The question in my mind is how much less efficient is the NW and does it offset the "better" quality of foam. I clearly see that NW is better for smaller low pressure applications.

NW in operation is similar to the old SeaClones and they do produce a nice volume of foam for the pump they use. I do wonder if the NW impeller vs. a regular paddle spinning at several thousand rpms really makes a difference in foam production or is it marketing hype?

I'm still so confused! A little knowledge is dangerous.


_________

300 Reef; 325LR, 1/2" sand bed in tank, 3" sand bed in 215 gal sump/refugium and Berliner PowerPro SS twin becket skimmer. 210 Reef; with 225 lbs of LR, 300 lb DSB, Large W/D and Jebo 520 skimmer modified to accept a becket. 90 RR FOWLR; tied into the 300's sump with a closed loop for extra circulation. 55 hospital.
Blade_Runner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reef Links
Click Here!